Startup Competitions in the Middle East

Be it money, equity, consultation, incubation or simply a platform to fine-tune the elevator pitch, startup competitions have manufactured an industry of their own with impressive prizes on offer.

In 2016 alone, there were more than 35 competitions or application deadlines for competitions listed in the Middle East and North Africa. Winning those competitions could even get the chosen few to the other side of the world to compete globally.

But do these competitions actually add value to the entrepreneur and the regional ecosystem?

For Diya Khalil, winner of the 2013 Dubai+Acumen Business Plan Competition, his own startup, Green Truck, would not exist had it not been for the competition.

“My idea initially was more of a social service than a business,” Khalil explained. “With the competition I had to work on the financials to show that it can be a sustainable business. From that, the business became more convincing to the jury and myself… it gave me the confidence that I can do it.”

Khalil’s prize was valued at 100,000 Emirati dirhams (US$27,000) with 50 percent of it in cash and the rest in investment and consultation. There was a delay in the prize reaching Khalil, but it gave Green Truck the seed funding it needed.

The Acumen competition is among the few that require a business plan from competitors along with the pitch. Many others focus on a final pitch to determine the winner where submitting a strategy plan could be part of the application process. These pitches can often be limited to one minute of stage time.

Some competitions like MIT EF, Acumen, Harvard Arab Alumni Association's challenge, Mompreneur Rising, are events built around training and connecting the competitors in preparation for the win. Others run a competition as an extension of their brand or of a larger event. Recent examples include Arabnet Ideathon, STEP conference, and Infiniti Speed Pitching.

STEP was founded in 2012 to create the “ultimate conference experience” for people interested in tech and the startup ecosystem, while the pitching competition was first launched in 2014 because the team was “constantly thinking how [to] help startups get their voices out there. That year was proven to be highly successful [and] almost felt like a trading floor but entrepreneurs pitching,” said Bahaa Moussalli, cofounder of STEP. The ideal outcome for the winner? To secure investment because of the competition and to make it big later on.

STEP follows up personally with their winners, but many organizers wrap up the conversation at the winners announcement press release. MIT EF, for instance, does not follow up but keeps tabs on their winners. For them, there’s been a 40 percent success rate of winners stepping into the big leagues worldwide.

Instabug and Instabeat are among those successes. On looking back over MIT EF's past winners, Wamda found that some do not even have websites to confirm the company's existence

Khalil’s Green Truck was recently bought out by Enviroserve, though Khalil remains the operations lead for the company and Boxit just closed their seed round at $600,000.

Myhrvold adds that in the case of all competitions, entrepreneurs must analyze the opportunity cost against the return on time before entering.

“Your time is the most valuable thing you have,” Myhrvold said. “If you are spending a lot of time at different competitions you’re losing on your business. You need to be very specific about what you want to accomplish from these competitions... it’s very important to be selective and review what it is you are getting into."

COMPETE AT YOUR OWN RISK

This article was originally published on Wamda on June 26, 2016.

That being said, presenting your business over and over again does not hurt, says author Sallyann Della Casa, also a judge and 'lead tree shaker' at Growing Leaders Foundation, as long as the startups learn from the feedback.

Della Casa especially encourages the startups that come to her to participate at a global level. "It is so important in the connected world we are in that they see how they stack up and look outside their usual ecosystem for partners, ideas, opportunities etcetera.”

The region is in the middle of building a rising ecosystem at par with the world average. Catherina Ballout, GCC managing director of MIT Enterprise Forum for the Pan Arab Region (MIT EF), says competitions serve as mini, virtual accelerators to shortlist the entrepreneurs. MIT EF runs the Arab Start Up competition that supports nearly 200-300 startups, recruited to participate by industry professionals.

“We started because the support of entrepreneurs wasn't there,” Ballout said. “Changing the world is our motivation. We are a platform to promote innovation and want to put the Arab World on the world map of innovation. [MIT EF] competition is the intermediary between entrepreneurs and everyone else who gives support [to them].”

Competitions are expensive endeavors for organizers and startups alike. Some like MIT EF pay for travel - flight costs alone could reach $80,000 at times, Ballout said - and accommodation at initial stages in addition to charges for trainers, mentors, judges. There’s a machinery that needs to perfectly play out leading up to the final day. And, more often than not, competitors have to pay out of pocket costs and, like Khalil, carve hours out from full-time jobs to meet deadlines and deliverables.

For entrepreneurs at an idea stage, the competitions are a great way to “have fun and experiment in a safe setting”, says Louis Lebbos, cofounder of Astrolabs and founder of one of the region’s flagship startups, Namshi.

That is exactly why Premlal Pullisserry, founder of Kuwait based Boxit, entered his first competition, the Startup MENA GCC Pitch Challenge in 2015.

“There were a lot of things to learn from the competition,” Premlal told Wamda. “You could improve your presentation skills, refine your idea, how you communicate that idea, and if you win it gives you validation. At that stage [of our business], it was a boost for us.”

Pullisserry went on to win the local competition, but not the regional one. Since then, he has participated in eight competitions winning more than half of them. The team “had different motives at different stages” ranging from getting their name out, to expanding their network, and sometimes building mileage right before an investment.

Christopher Schroeder, author of StartUp Rising and a frequent judge, prefers competitions where the pitching comes with enough time for reference checking, meeting entrepreneurs and absorbing materials in advance.

“The risk in both [competition types] are entrepreneurs who chase them as ‘cheap equity’ or like the celebrity of it,” Schroeder said. “When I see entrepreneurs pitch me and they've won several of these things, I wonder if they really have built anything.”

On the other hand, especially in rising ecosystems, both allow for connecting with other entrepreneurs and money, test propositions in stress environments and force startups to focus their ideas, he added.

Training vs branding vs money

The organizer, ultimately, becomes the true value creator of the competition.

“On one end, it forces some discipline of thinking and provides a forum for talent to meet, network, engage with customers and mentors,” Schroeder said. “[But], I see too many entrepreneurs in all markets who go from competition to competition and think winning a few bucks here or there is victory. For me, this is more about vanity than enterprise creation.”

Presentation Practice

“Competition organizers should start with a genuine desire and mission to do something positive for the participants and winners and build on that,” Lebbos said. “However, if the competition is designed for the benefit of a sponsor/for PR purposes then it generally is negative value for the startups.”

Organizer objectives can be key to winning

Every competition comes with its own criteria, limiting the submitted ideas. MIT EF, for example, requires at least one Arab national per team. Others filter competitors based on the number of years since launch, the funding stage or type of service. Pullisserry points out that once you figure out the organizer’s objectives, it eases the preparation process and could help you win.

No matter the prize, Teachmenow’s, Thea Myhrvold says it is crucial to pay close attention to the prize and ensure that the judging criteria is clearly available for judges and competitors.

“Look at what the competition organizers are getting into,” Myhrvold said. “Is there equity at stake, is it just a cash prize, what are the terms and conditions associated to it? Look at the people behind the competition - what is their credibility, who is the company, what are they promoting - and you’ll know how serious they are.”